Enclave Shield
Shield combines per-app CPU isolation with masked GPU offload. Windows host-OS memory exclusion was demonstrated locally on the reference host on 2026-10-23, but the per-app report still records host_excluded: no. The hypervisor and physical operator remain trusted. Linux CPU isolation is a design; the complete isolation contract must not be inferred from per-app placement or a working GPU component.
Confidential hardware
Each app keeps its own domain, and the processor adds a boundary around the whole machine: memory is encrypted and integrity-protected against everything outside it, operator included. Before connecting, you check a report signed by the processor and chained to the silicon vendor.
GPU admission
A GPU in a supported confidential-computing mode runs inside the boundary. Any other GPU, even one beside a confidential processor, is used only through Shield's masked offload: the card sees masked inputs, its results are checked before use, and it never receives plaintext protected state. Admission reads proof of the card's own mode, never the CPU, the host, or a missing field. Until that proof checks out, the card is neither advertised nor routed.
Scope and limitations
Protection claims are specific to the backend and evidence: the Windows memory test is a local demonstration, not a per-app attested guarantee. Neither the platform nor Enclave Shield has had an external audit. A confidential processor defends memory against software, not against physical attacks with lab equipment, and a self-hosted seller has physical access to their own machine. Documented deployments do not establish the complete target contract. Ordinary virtualization with the host OS in charge is a research control, not a supported product tier. Which hosts are attached, and what each has proven, is on the live fleet panel and in the dated evidence note on the architecture page. The contract, property by property →